Judge Andrew Napolitano: Constitution bars Trump from spending without OK of Congress — courts should stop it

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”— U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9

Congress and the White House have been at loggerheads for weeks on the next phase of federal aid to those suffering financially and who lost jobs because of governor-mandated lockdown orders in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. At last count, more than 30 million Americans who had full-time jobs a year ago are today unemployed.

All states have unemployment compensation, for which employees and employers make regular contributions. The payments of compensation are calculated as a percentage of income earned in the year before the job loss. Obviously, this number is different for all people, and it varies from state to state.

Embarrassed that it was caught flat-footed in the failure of leadership over the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal government — pursuant to appropriations made by law — borrowed $3 trillion in April, May and June and shipped out nearly all of it to small businesses and individuals. It gave $600 a week in unemployment compensation to those out of work, irrespective of their 2019 earnings and in addition to whatever state funds these folks received.

TRUMP'S $400 UNEMPLOYMENT EXTENSION: YOUR TOP QUESTIONS ANSWERED

This is the worst way out of this politically induced recession. Borrowing and giving away money will just postpone the day of reckoning.

Rather, the feds should cut taxes and spending drastically, and give tax credits to businesses for each person hired. The states, in turn, should permit those who want to operate their businesses to do so, with their customers and employees assuming the risk of patronage or employment.     

But don’t hold your breath for these free-market solutions to happen. It would mean a loss of control for the government.

Shortly before the $600 weekly payments ended two weeks ago, Congress began negotiating with the White House for a continuation of the payments.

The House Democrats want to borrow and give away another $3 trillion, much of it to bail out cities and states hard-hit by the loss of tax revenue. The White House wants to borrow and give away $1 trillion, but only in direct payments to businesses and individuals.

When it became apparent that a compromise could not be reached and Congress would not vote to extend the federal unemployment compensation to individuals, President Trump ordered the Treasury to pay all unemployed people $300 a week, provided the states pay them $100 a week, in addition to their state unemployment compensation.

How can the president spend money that has not been appropriated by law?

Here is the backstory.

The Constitution champions the well-accepted structures of government known as the separation of powers and federalism.

Under the separation of powers, Congress writes the laws, the president enforces them, and the judiciary decides what the laws mean and if they are constitutional. Since federal monies can only be spent by legislation, and since only Congress writes federal laws, only it can enact legislation that spends federal monies.

I use the phrase “federal monies” rather than “federal funds” or “taxpayer dollars” because the federal government is broke. It owes $26.5 trillion to its creditors. So, whatever monies Congress gives away, it must first borrow.

But whether Congress is giving away taxpayer dollars, buying battleships or borrowing money, it must do so by legislation. We know this because the separation of powers prohibits the president or the courts from doing Congress’ job. We also know this because the Constitution expressly states in Article I, Section 9, that no money shall be spent except when appropriated by law.

Stated differently, the Treasury cannot legally borrow or spend a nickel unless it has been expressly authorized to do so by law — meaning by legislation enacted by Congress. This is neither a novel nor a political observation. It is Constitutional Law 101.

Thus, when the president — no matter his goals — attempts to exercise power that the Constitution has given exclusively to Congress, it is the duty of the courts to stop him.       

It is similarly the duty of the courts to enjoin the president from enforcing any law or taking any action that violates the principle of federalism. This principle mandates state sovereignty and independence in areas of governance reserved to the states. Federalism is mandated as well by the Guarantee Clause of the Constitution.

According to the Supreme Court, that clause means that state officials decide how to employ state assets and spend state funds. Stated differently, neither the president nor Congress can tell the states that they must spend $100 a week on unemployed people in their states.

Inasmuch as Trump’s executive order has the state contribution of $100 a week per person as a trigger for individuals to receive the federally borrowed $300 a week, the executive order is not only doubly unconstitutional, it is functionless as an instrument of aid. Rather, it is an instrument of politics only.

Not too long ago, an American president asked Congress to change immigration laws. When it refused to do as this president asked, he boasted that he could govern more effectively than Congress using his phone and pen. He then signed 24 executive orders purporting to accomplish what he had requested of Congress. One of the candidates running to succeed him blasted this unconstitutional presidential behavior and denounced this president.

The president was Barack Obama and the candidate was Donald Trump. How different the world must look from inside 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. when looking out than from outside looking in.

Yet, the Constitution remains the same. It is the supreme law of the land. And, as such, all government behavior is only lawful when it is subordinate to it, no matter what any president says.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO



TAGS: Judge Andrew Napolitano Constitution bars Trump from spending without OK of Congress courts should stop it


13 Aug 2020 12:22   |    181

Source: www.foxnews.com


Or (another similitude) is that of a rain-laden cloud from the sky: In it are zones of darkness, and thunder and lightning: They press their fingers in their ears to keep out the stunning thunder-clap, the while they are in terror of death. But Allah is ever round the rejecters of Faith!  (The Cow   19 )


POPULAR NEWS

Presidential debate coach previews Trump-Biden matchup
State of the 2020 battlegrounds: Ohio, the unexpected swing state
Damon Friedman: I nearly killed myself, but then saw God had a purpose for me. Get help if you are struggling
Curtis Hill: Black Kentucky AG wrongly attacked by other Blacks for not charging cops in Breonna Taylor death
President Trump ties Biden to Virginia governor at rally in an effort to portray him as extreme
Biden maintains dominance over Trump in ad wars spending battle
Gregg Jarrett: Stunning revelations expose FBI’s Trump probe as dirtiest political trick in US history
Democratic committee plans to spend $16 million on legislative races in key states
Democrats pledge to focus on ObamaCare in battle over Supreme Court
Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee to spend $16M in battleground states
Wisconsin governor urges GOP to wear coronavirus masks as cases surge
Harris says Ginsburg broke ‘barriers,’ clearing path for other women to follow
Arizona Republican governor, Dem state secretary joust over election law changes
Maureen Mackey: This key Joe Biden question needs to be asked early and often
Virginia counties see multiple absentee ballots sent to more than 1,000 voters
Kamala Harris under scrutiny in Supreme Court showdown following testy 2018 Kavanaugh hearings
Kristin Cavallari mom-shamed for posting topless pic in thong bikini: ‘Appropriate for a mom of 3?’
Thomas Jipping: Senate Dems flip-flop on Supreme Court vacancies, take factually wrong and misleading position
President Trump to push for Juneteenth to become national holiday: report
Jacob Tice: My brother Austin Tice asked me to go to Syria with him. Four months later, he was taken

Email subscription:

Related Politics News