Sen. Deb Fischer: Russia, China nuclear threats – US must do this to face range of modern challenges

Ten years ago, the New START nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia entered into force. And earlier this month, the State Department announced a five-year extension of the treaty just days before it was set to expire.

The media was quick to praise this decision, with one prominent publication claiming that President Biden had singlehandedly "avoided a renewed arms race" in his first month in office.

New START has been a crucial part of our relationship with Russia for the past decade. But let’s be clear: This single treaty doesn’t protect us from every threat we face. The U.S. must do more to curb the nuclear ambitions of our geopolitical rivals.

FRED FLEITZ: IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL – BIDEN RUSHING AHEAD FOR THESE 3 TROUBLING REASONS

To begin with, New START limits only certain categories of nuclear arms: ground-based and submarine-launched intercontinental missiles, as well as heavy bombers. Since the treaty was signed, the United States has chosen not to invest in new nuclear weapons outside of its limits.

Russia has done the opposite, and in fact maintains an active stockpile of thousands of nuclear weapons not included within New START’s parameters, ranging from short-range ballistic missiles to depth charges. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

Russia’s investment in its nuclear arsenal since New START was signed demonstrates that Russian leaders view the nuclear domain no differently than they view space or cyberspace – where their nefarious activity is more widely reported. It’s clear that Russia seeks to gain a competitive advantage and will go around limits – as they have with New START – or right through them, as they did with the INF Treaty.

Moreover, New START includes only the U.S. and Russia. China, the world’s fastest-growing nuclear power, is not a party to the agreement.

Bearing out the seriousness of China’s buildup, Adm. Charles Richard, the commander of U.S. Strategic Command, noted earlier this month: "China’s nuclear weapons stockpile is expected to double – if not triple or quadruple – over the next decade."

The fact that nuclear threats continue to grow with New START in place demonstrates that it simply does not address the full spectrum of challenges the free world faces.

As the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, which oversees our nuclear arsenal, I believe the renewal of New START offers a critical opportunity to regain perspective and chart a new path forward.

America must focus on addressing the rapid growth of both of Russia and China’s nuclear forces. To accomplish this, some have suggested that the Biden administration should call for another round of talks. But while diplomacy might put some minds at ease, it won’t yield the results we desire.

In truth, we don’t need another conference in yet another European capital, with delegates gathering for manicured press events in gilded meeting rooms. Negotiating limits on Russia’s tactical weapons and bringing China into the arms control process have long been U.S. diplomatic objectives. Under the Obama and Trump administrations, both countries have consistently refused to substantively engage with us.

Their intransigence shows that neither nation feels motivated to negotiate. Entering into new talks without first addressing that problem would get us nowhere.

Instead, there needs to be a serious effort here at home to incentivize both Russia and China to halt their nuclear buildups. At a minimum, that means rejecting calls from some activists to unilaterally cut our own nuclear forces, or to at least delay their much-needed modernization.

Our senior military leaders have consistently advised against such courses of action, and the past two administrations have rejected them as well.

As most of my colleagues in the Senate recognize, our nuclear forces have aged far beyond their designed lifetime. Delaying their modernization would mean allowing our systems to age into obsolescence without replacement. Our deterrent would quite literally wither on the vine.

Should that happen, why would our competitors agree to new rounds of arms reductions if they knew the U.S. was cutting its forces anyway, regardless of whether they agreed to do the same? 

Under no circumstances can we dismantle our nuclear triad or cancel modernization programs. Doing so would make our country less safe by cutting the forces needed to deter aggression, and destroy America’s ability to push for real nuclear arms reductions by Russia and China in the future.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY SEN. DEB FISCHER



TAGS: Sen Deb Fischer Russia China nuclear threats US must do this to face range of modern challenges


23 Feb 2021 21:06   |    236

Source: www.foxnews.com


When they meet those who believe, they say: "We believe;" but when they are alone with their evil ones, they say: "We are really with you: We (were) only jesting."Allah will throw back their mockery on them, and give them rope in their trespasses; so they will wander like blind ones (to and fro).  (The Cow   14-15 )


POPULAR NEWS

Pets adopted during the pandemic are being returned at record numbers: report
Disney World shares Halloween plans with new ‘Boo Bash’ event, plus festive treats
Charity pays off mortgage for family of fallen NYPD officer
‘I need more beer’ woman dies at the age of 94
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano: Now the Post Office is spying on Americans -- will our government ever behave?
WATCH: British Royal Marines testing jetpacks that can reach speeds of 80 mph
‘COVID Bandit’ leaves $4,600 tip for Colorado restaurant staff
Disney World’s Star Wars hotel opening pushed to next year
Princess Eugenie reveals new photos of son August on husband Jack Brooksbank’s birthday
RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel: We must let our incredible teachers get back in the classroom
Met Gala 2021: Everything to know about this year’s extravaganza
Good Samaritan in Maryland rescues infant thrown into bay during crash
Billie Eilish models lingerie for British Vogue cover shoot: ‘It’s all about what makes you feel good’
Billie Eilish models lingerie for British Vogue cover shoot: ‘It’s all about what makes you feel good’
Secret Service agent dies training at Bush compound in Maine
Senate confirms former Florida Sen. Bill Nelson to head NASA
Remote learning during coronavirus caused stress, anxiety in students, survey finds
Vaccinated Americans are traveling to these vacation destinations
Mom accidentally names daughter Korn due to birth certificate error
Boy dies of coronavirus in Hawaii after traveling with fully vaccinated parents

Email subscription:

Related Opinion News